When coming across a problem in the built environment it is sometimes possible to
overthink an issue.
This is not surprising as when a property professional is confronted with any problem
the old grey matter amassed from years of training and experience kicks in. If
our brain activity could be visualised digitally when the thought process is
under way I am sure it would be something spectacular and quite beautiful to
behold.
There is some comfort and reassurance to be found in coming across
familiar or similar observations, patterns and trends as a basis on which to
start that rational and diagnostic approach towards a resolution to keep
clients happy.
Or so I thought.
My particular quandary was about strange
discolouration to the internal walls of a modern cavity built house.
The
occupants had observed a sort of downward creeping shadow to an upstairs outer
corner.
The usual tackling of it with detergent and anti-mould wipes appeared
to have been successful in the short term but the problem returned quickly.
I was called in to
provide the answers.
It was a rented house but the tenants were conscientious
in heating and ventilation and condensation could be ruled as the cause.
The
surface was dry when tested.
The external shell of the house, corresponding
roof area, barge-boarding and external brick skin were, visually as good as new
with no cracked, damaged or missing elements.
The orientation of the affected wall was north
westerly and so had reasonable exposure to warming sunlight to dry any
persistent rainfall driven by a prevailing westerly..
The discolouration, according to the residents, did
not take place immediately after wet weather. That was in my mind a good candidate for the issue.
This
initial diagnosis exhausted my first line of equipment . Moisture and
humidity testers went back in their cases along with binoculars, compass and mobile
phone Met Office records.
I now had to call upon technology.
My rather plasticky
but nevertheless effective boroscopic camera was put on charge but I would need
a scaffolding rig to reach the area of investigation. That and someone to drill
a probing hole would be chargeable services that may not be acceptable to the client.
We were already in the realms of a mountaineering type expedition for a
relatively mole-hill situation.
I thought laterally which took me into the
really fantastic options.
The environmental company that I knew had a thermal imaging camera
did not come back to my reasonable enquiry about using it to check for any
thermal cold spots from slipped or absent insulation.
The drone operator, regularly lobbying for an opportunity to show off his aircraft felt
that the locality was a bit tight to take off and fly about in.
These further
thoughts took a bit of time and although grateful and gracious about my efforts the client was still a bit anxious.
I had to apply myself with even more
latitude and ever more thought whilst keeping everything in context.
Yes, it
was an inconvenience but no, it was not a major defect, health hazard or lifestyle
issue.
The actual cause was something that I could not have anticipated or
expected.
This came to light a few weeks after I and the client had reached the
stage of mutually accepted defeat.
In the course of a bit of adjustment to
plumbing in another part of the roofspace, away from the observed
discolouration the actions or rather inactions of a common or garden slug in an overflow
pipe had been the problem.
Who would have thunk that?
No comments:
Post a Comment